Comparisons

Linux Mint vs Ubuntu: desktop, Snap, support and the server question

Linux Mint vs Ubuntu: Mint is Ubuntu LTS with Cinnamon, no Snap and slower releases. Desktop, updates and support compared, and why a VPS runs Ubuntu.

Published ~9 min read
On this page

Short answer: Linux Mint is Ubuntu LTS underneath, with a different desktop and different defaults. Mint 22.3 runs on the packages of Ubuntu 24.04 LTS but swaps GNOME for Cinnamon (or MATE, or Xfce), keeps Snap switched off and leaves updates for you to approve, while Ubuntu ships GNOME, the Snap store and automatic security updates, and reaches each new LTS months before Mint does. On a desktop the choice is mostly about taste and hardware. On a server there is no choice to make: Mint has no server edition, so a VPS runs Ubuntu Server or Debian.

Versions and dates below are as of October 2026, taken from the Linux Mint project’s and Canonical’s own release announcements.

Linux Mint vs Ubuntu at a glance

Linux MintUbuntu
Package baseUbuntu LTS (Mint 22.x uses 24.04, codename noble); LMDE 7 uses Debian 13 insteadIts own archive, synced from Debian unstable at the start of each cycle
Current releaseMint 22.3 “Zena”; LMDE 7 “Gigi”26.04 LTS (April 2026) and 24.04 LTS, plus an interim release every six months
Default desktopCinnamon; MATE and Xfce editions on the same download pageGNOME with Ubuntu’s dock; official flavours with KDE Plasma, Xfce, MATE, Budgie, Cinnamon and LXQt
Display sessionX11 by default; the Cinnamon Wayland session is still experimental in 22.xWayland by default; on 26.04 the GNOME session is Wayland only
SnapBlocked by default; Firefox is a normal .deb packagePreinstalled; Firefox, Thunderbird and the App Center itself are snaps
FlatpakBuilt into Software Manager, with Flathub enabledNot installed by default
UpdatesUpdate Manager lists them, you apply them; automatic mode is opt-inSecurity updates install automatically through unattended-upgrades
Release rhythmOne major release after each Ubuntu LTS, then point releases on the same baseEvery April and October; an LTS every two years
SupportMint 22.x until 2029, the life of its 24.04 base5 years per LTS (24.04 to 2029, 26.04 to 2031), up to 10 with Ubuntu Pro
Server editionNoneUbuntu Server, plus cloud images with cloud-init
Backed byThe Linux Mint team, funded by donations and sponsorsCanonical, which also sells support (Ubuntu Pro)

Mint is Ubuntu underneath: what carries over

Mint’s main edition takes Ubuntu LTS’s package archive as it is and puts a small repository of its own on top: the Cinnamon, MATE and Xfce desktops it builds, its own tools (Update Manager, Software Manager, Driver Manager and the Xapps), and replacements for a handful of Ubuntu packages, Firefox among them. The kernel, the libraries, systemd, APT and almost every program you install come from Ubuntu’s mirrors. In practice that means:

  • Ubuntu instructions work on Mint almost without exception: the same apt commands, the same .deb packages, the same systemd units and the same paths under /etc.
  • Security fixes come from the same place. Mint pulls Ubuntu’s packages from Ubuntu’s own security archive, so a patched OpenSSL or kernel is the identical build on both. Mint just asks before installing it.
  • Codenames are the one trap. Where a guide puts the release codename into a repository line, Mint needs Ubuntu’s codename, not its own. Our Docker install guide notes the one-word change, and this prints the right value on any Mint release:
Linux Mint
. /etc/os-release && echo "$UBUNTU_CODENAME"     # noble on Mint 22.x

LMDE, the Linux Mint Debian Edition, is the project’s insurance policy: the same Cinnamon desktop and Mint tools on Debian instead of Ubuntu, so Mint would carry on if Ubuntu ever went somewhere it could not follow. LMDE 7 “Gigi”, released in October 2025, is built on Debian 13 and ships Cinnamon only. If you like Mint’s desktop but prefer Debian’s slower base, that is the edition to try; how Debian itself differs from Ubuntu is covered in Debian vs Ubuntu.

Desktop: Cinnamon, MATE or Xfce vs GNOME

This is the difference you see in the first minute. Cinnamon puts a panel along the bottom with a menu in the corner, a window list and a system tray: the layout anyone coming from Windows already knows. Ubuntu’s GNOME is built around the Activities overview, a dock on the left and an app grid; it works best when you launch things by typing and switch between workspaces, and changing its behaviour usually means installing extensions.

Mint offers three editions of each release. Its installation guide describes Cinnamon as the most modern and full-featured, MATE as more traditional and faster, and Xfce as the most lightweight, and suggests Cinnamon if you are unsure. On an older laptop with little memory, Xfce or MATE is the better place to start.

The comparison narrows once you look at Ubuntu’s official flavours: Xubuntu, Ubuntu MATE and Ubuntu Cinnamon put the same desktops on top of Ubuntu. What is left between, say, Mint Xfce and Xubuntu is Mint’s tooling and its Snap policy, not the desktop.

Wayland and X11

Ubuntu runs GNOME on Wayland by default, and on 26.04 the GNOME session is Wayland only (older X11 programs still run through XWayland). Mint 22.x starts Cinnamon on X11 and offers a Wayland session that the project still calls experimental. If you rely on an older screen-sharing, remote-control or automation tool that only works on X11, Mint is the easier home for it today.

Snap vs Flatpak: the policy difference

Ubuntu installs snapd and leans on it: the App Center is a snap, Firefox and Thunderbird are snaps, and sudo apt install firefox installs a small transitional package that pulls in the snap. Snaps update themselves in the background, run sandboxed and tend to start more slowly the first time.

Mint objects to the Snap Store being a single store controlled by one company, and to APT installing snaps without the user asking. Since Mint 20 it ships a preference file that stops APT from installing snapd at all, packages Firefox as an ordinary .deb, and builds Flatpak with Flathub into its Software Manager instead. Nothing is locked: if you need a program that only exists as a snap, remove the block and install snapd:

Linux Mint: allow snaps again
sudo rm /etc/apt/preferences.d/nosnap.pref
sudo apt update
sudo apt install snapd

On a headless server this whole question shrinks to almost nothing, because server software is installed through APT either way; the Snap section of Debian vs Ubuntu explains the server side.

Release rhythm and support length

Ubuntu releases every April and October. The April release of every even year is an LTS with five years of standard security updates, which Ubuntu Pro extends to ten (free for personal use on up to five machines); the releases in between get nine months.

Mint only follows the LTS releases. A few months after each Ubuntu LTS it publishes a new major version on that base, then point releases on the same base about every six months (22, 22.1, 22.2, 22.3), and every one of them is supported until the base’s standard support ends: 2029 for the whole 22.x series.

The result in October 2026: Ubuntu 26.04 LTS has been out since April, while Mint is still on the 24.04 base. In April 2026 the Mint team announced a longer development cycle, with its next major release, built on Ubuntu 26.04, planned for December 2026. So Mint reaches a new kernel and new desktop versions later than Ubuntu; in exchange, moving between 22.x point releases is a small step.

major upgrades
# Ubuntu: move to the next release (LTS to LTS by default)
sudo do-release-upgrade

# Linux Mint: point releases come through Update Manager (Edit menu);
# a major upgrade uses Mint's own tool
sudo apt install mintupgrade
sudo mintupgrade

Whichever you run, checking the exact version takes one command and tells you how long the release you are on still gets updates.

Updates, snapshots and drivers

  • Security updates. Ubuntu installs them on its own by default through unattended-upgrades; Software Updater offers the rest. Mint’s Update Manager lists everything and waits for you, and its automatic mode is a setting you switch on under Preferences, Automation. Neither approach is wrong, but on Mint an unattended machine only stays patched once you turn that on.
  • Snapshots. Mint preinstalls Timeshift, so a system snapshot before a risky update is a few clicks away. Ubuntu has Timeshift in its archive but does not install it.
  • Graphics drivers. Both install the same proprietary NVIDIA driver packages from Ubuntu’s archive: on Ubuntu through Software & Updates, Additional Drivers (or sudo ubuntu-drivers install), on Mint through Driver Manager.
  • Brand-new hardware. What matters is the kernel. Ubuntu 26.04 ships Linux 7.0; Mint 22.x stays on the kernels that Ubuntu 24.04 provides, including its newer hardware-enablement series, until Mint’s next major release. Mint’s Update Manager has a kernel window for installing and switching between those.

Linux Mint on a server or VPS: use Ubuntu or Debian instead

Mint has no server edition, no minimal install, no cloud image and no cloud-init support. Its ISO boots a live desktop, and everything Mint adds on top of Ubuntu is desktop software. A Mint machine at home can run a few services, since it is Ubuntu underneath, but on a server all of that desktop is dead weight that still needs updates, and every hosting provider’s images, documentation and automation assume a server distribution.

The good news is that the step across is small. Ubuntu Server 24.04 LTS is the same package base as Mint 22.x, so the versions on your VPS match the ones on your desktop, and Debian is the natural choice if you already like LMDE. On VMHeaven the templates are Ubuntu 24.04, 22.04 and 20.04 and Debian 13, 12 and 11; Mint is not one of them, and the panel has no ISO upload to bring it yourself.

If what you actually want is a Mint-style desktop in a data centre, install a light desktop on Ubuntu or Debian and connect over RDP, as in setting up xrdp on Ubuntu and Debian. Both archives package MATE and Cinnamon as well as Xfce. MATE and Xfce suit a VPS best: Cinnamon expects 3D acceleration, which a virtual server does not have, so it falls back to software rendering and feels sluggish over a remote connection.

Ubuntu 24.04 or Debian 12/13: a MATE desktop for xrdp
sudo apt install -y mate-desktop-environment-core xorgxrdp xrdp
echo mate-session > ~/.xsession     # as the user who will log in over RDP

Which one should you pick?

  • Coming from Windows and want it to feel familiar on day one? Linux Mint with Cinnamon.
  • An older or low-memory laptop? Mint Xfce or MATE, or Xubuntu if you would rather stay on Ubuntu proper.
  • Brand-new hardware, or you want the newest GNOME and kernel? Ubuntu 26.04 LTS.
  • Company laptops, certified hardware, paid support? Ubuntu: Canonical certifies machines from the large vendors and sells support through Ubuntu Pro.
  • No snaps, without fighting the system? Mint, or Debian.
  • A server, VPS or cloud instance? Ubuntu Server LTS or Debian. Not Mint.

None of these choices locks you in. The terminal, APT, systemd and the file layout are the same on all three, so what you learn on a Mint laptop is exactly what you use on an Ubuntu or Debian server.

Frequently asked

Is Linux Mint based on Ubuntu?

Yes. Linux Mint 22.x is built on the package base of Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, with Mint's own desktops and tools on top, and its next major release, planned for December 2026, moves to Ubuntu 26.04. LMDE, the Linux Mint Debian Edition, is the exception: LMDE 7 is built on Debian 13.

Is Linux Mint or Ubuntu better for beginners?

For someone coming from Windows, Linux Mint's Cinnamon desktop is usually easier at first, with a taskbar, a start menu and a system tray where you expect them. Ubuntu's GNOME works differently but is the version most tutorials and vendors describe. Both use the same commands underneath, so what you learn on one carries over to the other.

Can I use Linux Mint as a server?

There is no Linux Mint server edition, cloud image or minimal install, only the desktop. It can run a few services at home because it is Ubuntu underneath, but for a VPS or dedicated server use Ubuntu Server LTS or Debian. Ubuntu 24.04 is the same base as Mint 22.x, so the package versions match your desktop.

Does Linux Mint use Snap?

Not by default. Since Mint 20, a file in /etc/apt/preferences.d stops APT from installing snapd, and Mint ships Firefox as a normal .deb package; Flatpak from Flathub is built into the Software Manager instead. Deleting /etc/apt/preferences.d/nosnap.pref and installing snapd turns Snap back on.

Related articles

All comparisons

Debian vs Ubuntu for a server: what actually differs

Both run APT and systemd. The differences that matter on a server are release and support length, sudo on a fresh install, Snap, and package freshness.

xrdp on Ubuntu and Debian: install an RDP desktop (XFCE) on a VPS and fix the black screen

Install xrdp with XFCE on Ubuntu 24.04 or Debian 12/13, add xrdp to ssl-cert, open port 3389 to your IP only or tunnel it over SSH, and fix the black screen.

How to check your Linux version: Ubuntu, Debian, Rocky and the kernel

cat /etc/os-release shows the distribution and release on any modern Linux, uname -r the kernel. Plus lsb_release, hostnamectl and the codenames apt needs.

Ubuntu Server GUI: install a light desktop, reach it remotely, remove it again

Ubuntu server GUI: install Xfce or GNOME on Ubuntu Server 24.04 or 26.04 without the extras, reach it over xrdp or VNC through SSH, and remove it again.

Fedora vs Ubuntu: release cycles, dnf vs apt, SELinux and servers

Fedora vs Ubuntu compared: 13-month releases vs 5-year LTS, dnf vs apt, Flatpak vs Snap, SELinux vs AppArmor, and which one belongs on a server.

Kali vs Parrot OS: which security distribution should you use?

Kali vs Parrot: Debian testing vs stable, Xfce vs KDE Plasma, editions, tools, release model and system requirements, and how to run either on a VPS.

Best Linux distro for servers: Debian, Ubuntu, Rocky, Alma and more

The best Linux distro for servers is usually Debian or Ubuntu LTS, Rocky or AlmaLinux for RHEL software. Support windows, packages and use cases compared.